#HONDA IBOOSTER DRIVER#
#HONDA IBOOSTER SOFTWARE#
#HONDA IBOOSTER WINDOWS#

#HONDA IBOOSTER WINDOWS#

One is installed with genuine windows, the other is installed with pirated windows and infected with a virus. This is like two computers of the same model.

#HONDA IBOOSTER SOFTWARE#

Tesla's big wind is one of the possibilities, but it is not ruled out that it is a software problem. But don't forget, there are many car companies that use iBooster, but it seems that Tesla is the only one that really frequently broke the brake failure incident. In terms of the current level of electromechanical manufacturing, I think the hardware is Reliability can be guaranteed. At least it is much simpler than a laptop or a mobile phone. In fact, its structure is not complicated. Security depends on both the hardware and the software, and this directly determines whether it is Bosch's responsibility or the responsibility of the car company, or both parties are responsible.įirst of all, the hardware of iBooster must be provided by Bosch. Because it triggered a BUG of the operating system, or was implanted with a virus and other software reasons. The probability of computer crashes caused by problems such as poor power contact and circuit board soldering is very small, and it is in most cases. In most cases, computer crashes are not caused by hardware damage, but software problems. This mainly depends on two aspects, hardware and software. The same question can also be replaced with 'Can the computer crash easily'. It's like the old mechanical typewriter can never do real-time editing of documents. Only in this way can the car be intelligent, because whether it is automatic braking, automatic driving or regenerative braking force, it can only be achieved with the help of an electronically controlled braking system, which is impossible with traditional machinery. Sounds unreliable, right? Because in terms of reliability, machinery is definitely more advantageous than electronic control, but why are more and more car companies favoring electronic control brakes? The reason is simple.

#HONDA IBOOSTER DRIVER#

When the driver steps on the brake pedal, it is equivalent to sending a braking signal, and then the iBooster system provides braking assistance according to the pedal depth to help the driver achieve the purpose of braking. Different from the vacuum pump assist of traditional cars, the power to distribute the braking force is mainly controlled by a servo motor, not a machine. Bosch is not the only one that makes electronically controlled brakes, but also Continental and Hitachi. IBooster is essentially an electronically controlled brake booster system. Once it is finally proved that iBooster is going to carry this pot, then a large number of car companies will inevitably encounter it, and the scope of the crisis of trust involved in it is hard to imagine. I suggest that everyone remember the keyword iBooster first, no matter what, because the models that use iBooster are not only Model 3, but also Weilai ES8, Porsche 918, Honda CR-V, Cadillac CT6, BYD e6, Roewe Ei5 Wait, there are many models involved. The braking system of Tesla Model 3 is different from traditional cars, using Bosch iBooster technology.

This is the root cause of disagreements on Tesla's braking safety. So far the outside world can only use limited information to make non-authoritative interpretations. Because it belongs to the category of trade secrets, it is impossible for Tesla to disclose the technical details to the public. I am afraid that only Tesla itself knows about this issue. How exactly does Tesla's brake system work? I will only talk about my own views on the Tesla brake system. Everything is based on the final conclusions of the authority. I will not make any guesses as to who is and who is not in this rights protection incident. So since it's about technology, I will not presume a position. It will not help the improvement of car braking safety in the future, so I decided to talk from a technical point of view. It is just a collective emotional carnival for the majority of consumers. It doesn't make much sense to talk about this matter confined to the attitude level.

The fierce discussions among netizens mainly revolved around the event itself, and the attitudes displayed were more based on the emotional level. One faction stops at Tesla, the other faction scolds Tesla. There was an uproar on the Internet, and the voices were divided into two factions. Just yesterday, Tesla announced the traffic data of the female car owner defending rights at the auto show before the incident.

Honda ibooster